Get Modifiers Right for Flu Multiple Flu Tests

Posted on 12 Nov, 2015 |comments_icon 9|By Chris Boucher

Using 87804 x 2 might result in denial.

If you’re performing a test that detects the flu via immunoassay in the office, your provider might test for two strains of the virus.

Impact: When you file these claims properly, you’ll be paid for two flu tests rather than one. Read on for a bit of knowledge on making your flu test claims sail through on the first try.

Use 87804 Each Time You I.D. a Flu Test

When the provider performs a flu test via immunoassay, code the screening with 87804 (Infectious agent antigen detection by immunoassay with direct optical observation; influenza), says Maggie M. Mac, CPC, CEMC, CHC, CMM, ICCE, president of Maggie Mac-Medical Practice Consulting in Clearwater, Fla.

The 87804 code represents “a testing platform that yields a typically qualitative result by producing a signal on the reaction chamber,” explains Melanie Witt, CPC, COBGC, MA, an independent coding consultant in Guadalupita, N.M.

If the test fits all the parameters put forth in its code descriptor, you should report 87804 for your provider’s flu test.


Use QW for Medicare Patients

Remember that 87804 is a CLIA- (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) waived test, meaning you need to have CLIA certification to perform this flu test.

Further, you must append modifier QW (CLIA-waived test) to each 87804 entry on your claim to indicate your CLIA status. The QW modifier is only required for Medicare payers, but some private payers might also want you to use QW.

For a list of CLIA-waived tests, see

Use Modifier 59 to Separate Tests

Once you’ve determined that your provider performed an 87804 flu test, you’re ready to check if she tested for both strains A and B of the flu.

When your provider performs this test in the office to for both flu strains A and B, you’ll be able to report 87804 twice. In order for the claim to succeed, however, you’ll need help from a modifier to separate the flu tests.

If the provider documents that the test provides two separate results — one for influenza virus A and one for B — it would be appropriate to report two units of code 87804, says Witt.

Mac advises coders to list 87804 on two lines with modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) appended to the second unit of 87804. This is preferable to reporting the code twice on the same line, in her experience.

Mac reports seeing claims with 87804 x 2 on one line, and the second flu test code was “completely ignored” by the payer. When you test for flu types A and B, “you get better responses with 87804-59 on the second line,” she says.


Chris Boucher

Chris Boucher has nearly 10 years of experience writing various newsletters and other products for The Coding Institute. His blog will cover several areas of coding and compliance, including CPT® coding, modifiers, HIPAA compliance and ICD-10 coding.

More from this author

View More

9 thoughts on “Get Modifiers Right for Flu Multiple Flu Tests

  1. Thanks a lot for providing individuals with such a remarkable opportunity to read critical reviews from this web site. It is always so useful plus stuffed with amusement for me and my office mates to search the blog at least thrice weekly to learn the new stuff you have. Not to mention, I’m so at all times amazed with the perfect advice you give. Some 4 facts in this post are surely the best we have all had.

  2. I want to show appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from such a scenario. Just after scouting throughout the search engines and meeting tips which were not productive, I assumed my entire life was done. Being alive minus the solutions to the difficulties you have fixed all through the article is a crucial case, as well as the ones that might have in a negative way affected my career if I had not come across the blog. Your personal knowledge and kindness in touching almost everything was priceless. I don’t know what I would have done if I had not come across such a point like this. I am able to at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks for your time so much for this expert and result oriented help. I will not be reluctant to propose the sites to any person who needs and wants care about this area.

  3. I have to point out my appreciation for your kindness in support of individuals that actually need guidance on this one situation. Your personal dedication to passing the solution throughout turned out to be really informative and has without exception allowed regular people much like me to get to their ambitions. Your valuable key points entails much a person like me and especially to my peers. Thanks a lot; from each one of us.

  4. I see you don’t monetize your website, don’t waste your traffic, you can earn extra cash every
    month because you’ve got hi quality content. If you want to know
    how to make extra $$$, search for: Mertiso’s tips best adsense alternative

  5. I in addition to my friends were found to be taking note of the great secrets from your web page and then all of a sudden got a horrible suspicion I never expressed respect to the web site owner for those tips. Those people were definitely consequently very interested to study all of them and have unquestionably been using them. I appreciate you for indeed being simply considerate and for using some good useful guides most people are really needing to understand about. Our honest regret for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter Signup