Evaluate Your E/M Coding, Because Medicare Is On Alert

Posted on 26 Sep, 2015 |comments_icon 7|By Chris Boucher
[addtoany]
medicare

CMS: Improper E/M coding on the uptick.

Practices that bill Medicare incorrectly create newsworthy events. If you don’t want to see your practice on the front page for the wrong reasons, you’ll need to check your E/M coding conventions to be sure you aren’t miscoding E/M services.

The lowdown: The 2014 Medicare Fee-for-Service improper payment rate was 12.7 percent. This is far worse than the error rates logged in 2012 and 2013, according to the latest Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) report.

Medicare Will Want Refunds

Perhaps unsurprisingly, CMS identified $47.6 billion that went out to Medicare providers in error, and chances are high that Medicare contractors will want that money back.

Most of the E/M coding errors were found in the following areas:

Documentation: For the second year in a row, Part B practices had a significantly higher error rate than Part A providers when it came to insufficient documentation, with Part B facing a 2.1 percent error rate as compared to 0.2 percent in Part A.

Incorrect coding: Part B providers rated the highest among incorrect coding errors, with a 0.8 percent error rate, which topped the Part A and DME rates. Not all of these errors reflected overpayments to practices — in some cases, doctors actually shorted themselves by coding incorrectly.

Non-physician practitioners: The CMS auditors also found a large number of errors among E/M claims performed by non-physician practitioners. “The CERT program identified many improper payments for E/M services billed using physician’s NPIs but provided solely by non-physician practitioners,” the report states. “NPPs must bill under their own NPIs if they provide an E/M service (in person) for a physician’s patient in hospital and the physician does not also perform (and document) a substantive part of an E/M visit face-to-face with the same beneficiary on the same date of service.”

Avoid These E/M Errors, Keep Coding On Track

Often, the coding errors were due to practices submitting documentation that supported a different E/M level than what was billed. Other issues included insufficient documentation, no physician authentication, or wrong place of service.

For example, the CERT reviewers audited one claim for 99214 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: a detailed history; a detailed examination; medical decision making of moderate complexity) that described a routine follow-up for a stable patient requiring no changes in treatment or medications. The auditors were unable to find justification for 99214, and downcoded the claim, marking it as an incorrect coding error.

To read the complete CERT results, visit www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Monitoring-Programs/Medicare-FFS-Compliance-Programs/CERT/Downloads/MedicareFeeforService2014ImproperPaymentsReport.pdf.

Author

Chris Boucher


Chris Boucher has nearly 10 years of experience writing various newsletters and other products for The Coding Institute. His blog will cover several areas of coding and compliance, including CPT® coding, modifiers, HIPAA compliance and ICD-10 coding.

More from this author

View More

7 thoughts on “Evaluate Your E/M Coding, Because Medicare Is On Alert

  1. I not to mention my friends have been checking out the good information and facts located on the blog while then came up with an awful feeling I never expressed respect to the web site owner for those techniques. All of the men were definitely so happy to see all of them and have now definitely been loving them. Appreciation for genuinely simply considerate as well as for obtaining this sort of high-quality issues millions of individuals are really needing to understand about. Our own honest apologies for not expressing gratitude to sooner.

  2. My wife and i felt absolutely contented Edward managed to round up his investigations via the precious recommendations he received using your web site. It’s not at all simplistic just to continually be giving out points that many people have been selling. So we know we have you to give thanks to for this. These explanations you made, the easy site navigation, the friendships you will assist to instill – it’s many exceptional, and it’s facilitating our son in addition to us reckon that this matter is amusing, and that is unbelievably fundamental. Thank you for everything!

  3. I must get across my respect for your kindness for those individuals that really need guidance on the situation. Your real commitment to getting the message all over was wonderfully insightful and have all the time made folks like me to achieve their targets. Your useful hints and tips denotes a great deal to me and especially to my mates. Thanks a ton; from each one of us.

  4. A lot of thanks for all of the effort on this blog. My niece take interest in working on investigations and it’s really simple to grasp why. Most people hear all of the powerful mode you make helpful ideas by means of your web blog and even strongly encourage contribution from others on this concept plus our favorite girl is truly starting to learn so much. Take advantage of the rest of the year. You’re the one carrying out a really good job.

  5. I simply had to thank you so much again. I am not sure what I could possibly have sorted out in the absence of the type of creative ideas provided by you concerning such problem. It truly was a daunting dilemma in my view, but being able to view a expert tactic you processed the issue took me to cry over joy. Extremely grateful for your help and then hope you find out what an amazing job you are carrying out educating other individuals through your websites. Probably you haven’t encountered any of us.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter Signup

Top